神马品牌网大学生自学网官网页版:虚心求教，高手们帮忙翻译一下吧
来源：百度文库 编辑：神马品牌网 时间：2024/05/05 20:18:20
Contingency Framework
Aggregate Business Performance=f (Profit)*(Risk) = f (Quality,
Availability,Cost......)* (Risks associated with Quality,Availability, Cost......)
Diagram 3.4 Managing Supply Chain Risk and Performance
Conclusion
The chapter has explored the development of a Contingency Framework for Risk
Management within the context of supply chains.We have recognized that such a
Contingency Framework may provide a number of benefits in terms of mapping
the research outputs in the field and seeking to clarify the key influencing or
contingency variables that are likely to impact on the risks that prevail of are
prescriptive advice to practitioners than might emanate from a more generic
formulation. However, the belief that there is a generic toolkit that decision
makers.may apply in almost every context has proved to be misleading in almost
every area of the decision sciences. Equally, the situational approach provides
little opportunity for the decision maker to apply any form of knowledge
transferred and experience gained from other decisions taken previously.
The most significant contribution of developing the proposed Contingency
Framework is in the research field.It should prove possible to either locate the
outcomes from research studies within this initial framework,in a sense
reinforcing the dimensions of the Framework or substantiating the individual
parameters and contingency variables.It is recognized that there are likely to be
gaps in the initial Framework and that an immediate task is to seek to fill these
gaps whilst simultaneously seeking to integrate research in adjoining of
com plementary fields (e.g. human risk and decision behavior ).
A further dimension of the Framework that deserves attention concerns the
metrics. The current drive to develop metrics ( e.g. Marketing Metrics-Ambler,
2003 )is also reflected in the field of risk management .Decision makers are
seeking some means of measuring the effectiveness of decisions taken to resolve
risk and improve the performance of the business.This relates to the point made
earlier that practitioners value more highly a Framework that provides practical
guidance and means of measuring the quality and effectiveness of their decisions.
Aggregate Business Performance=f (Profit)*(Risk) = f (Quality,
Availability,Cost......)* (Risks associated with Quality,Availability, Cost......)
Diagram 3.4 Managing Supply Chain Risk and Performance
Conclusion
The chapter has explored the development of a Contingency Framework for Risk
Management within the context of supply chains.We have recognized that such a
Contingency Framework may provide a number of benefits in terms of mapping
the research outputs in the field and seeking to clarify the key influencing or
contingency variables that are likely to impact on the risks that prevail of are
prescriptive advice to practitioners than might emanate from a more generic
formulation. However, the belief that there is a generic toolkit that decision
makers.may apply in almost every context has proved to be misleading in almost
every area of the decision sciences. Equally, the situational approach provides
little opportunity for the decision maker to apply any form of knowledge
transferred and experience gained from other decisions taken previously.
The most significant contribution of developing the proposed Contingency
Framework is in the research field.It should prove possible to either locate the
outcomes from research studies within this initial framework,in a sense
reinforcing the dimensions of the Framework or substantiating the individual
parameters and contingency variables.It is recognized that there are likely to be
gaps in the initial Framework and that an immediate task is to seek to fill these
gaps whilst simultaneously seeking to integrate research in adjoining of
com plementary fields (e.g. human risk and decision behavior ).
A further dimension of the Framework that deserves attention concerns the
metrics. The current drive to develop metrics ( e.g. Marketing Metrics-Ambler,
2003 )is also reflected in the field of risk management .Decision makers are
seeking some means of measuring the effectiveness of decisions taken to resolve
risk and improve the performance of the business.This relates to the point made
earlier that practitioners value more highly a Framework that provides practical
guidance and means of measuring the quality and effectiveness of their decisions.
意外情况框架聚集体事务Performance=f (Profit)*(Risk) = f (质量, 可及性, 费用......)* (风险联系了质量, 可及性, 花费了......) 图3.4 处理的供应链风险和表现结论章节探索了一个意外情况框架的发展为风险管理在供应之内上下文chains.We 认为, 这样意外情况框架也许提供一定数量的好处根据映射研究产品在领域并且寻求澄清可能对风险冲击战胜是规定的忠告对实习者的钥匙影响或意外情况可变物比威力发出从一种更加普通的公式化。但是, 信仰, 有决定makers.may 适用于在几乎每上下文的一个普通工具箱证明引入歧途的在几乎决策学的每个区域。相等地, 情势方法为作决策者提供少许机会应用任一个知识从其它决定转移和经验的形式获取早先被做出。开发提出的意外情况框架的最重大的贡献是在研究field.It 应该证明可能对或找出结果从研究研究在这最初的范围内, 实际上加强框架的维度或证实各自的参量和意外情况variables.It 被认可有可能是空白在最初的框架并且一项直接任务是寻求填补这些空白同时寻求集成对毗邻的研究com plementary 领域(即人的风险和决定行为) 。该当注意关心度规框架的一个进一步维度。当前的驱动开发度规(即营销度规Ambler, 2003)is 并且反映在风险管理Decision 制作商的领域寻找测量决定的有效率一些手段被做出对决心风险和改进business.This 的表现与观点关系提出更加早期实习者高度重视提供测量他们的决定的质量和有效率实用教导和手段的一个框架。