bulli:帮我翻译一段话，谢谢

The right to silence has been described as a human right, particularly by Murphy J in the trilogy of cases Pyneboard Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission, Sorby v Commonwealth and Controlled Consultants Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Corporate Affairs. More recently, in Environmental Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Company Pty Ltd the High Court held that the right to silence was a reflection of the procedural requirements of the privilege against self-incrimination and was integral to the protection of the natural legal person in a criminal justice system in which inquisitorial methods have no place. Similarly, in Pyneboard Mason ACJ, Wilson and Dawson JJ held that this rule of the common law provided a fundamental bulwark of liberty extending beyond its apparent simple existence as a rule of evidence applicable to judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings. However, the exclusion of corporations from its application reinforces the original purpose of the right, that being, the protection of the individual suspect from the state. It also reasserts the ‘primary testimonial focus of the privilege’.