烟台霍富锁厂招聘:高手帮忙翻译这段话吧！谢谢

Mr. Nicklin, who appears for Mr. Glennon (the defendant) today, takes two points on that. First, he says that there was no evidence given by the process server. That is true. But what is the effect of that? Cases are decided on the evidence of those who do give evidence and not of those who do not. The judge was no doubt aware that the process server might have given evidence and that he did not. But that does not show that Mr. Knight is not to be believed. Then it is said that the judge gave no reasons for accepting Mr. Knight's evidence and rejecting that of Mr. Glennon and his sister. Of course every professional judge should give reasons for decisions, which he makes. It is one of the tasks which society expects us to fulfill. But when the issue is simply, does one believe A, i.e. Mr. Knight, or B and C, i.e.. Mr. Glennon and his sister, there is often very little one can say, except that that is the conclusion to which one comes after they have given their evidence. So I do not see that that is a ground for holding that the judge's decision was flawed. ground for holding that the judge's decision was flawed.
关键是 there is often very little one can say, except that that is the conclusion to which one comes after they have given their evidence这句