神马品牌网宁泽涛孙杨击掌:急，在线等，帮忙翻一下
来源：百度文库 编辑：神马品牌网 时间：2024/04/20 17:06:47
The government can have three different functions:
1. The government can be the regulator of service provision and delivery by the private sector. Apart from general market supervision by anti-trust authorities, this particularly
involves sectors where forms of natural monopoly or undesirable forms of market power tend to emerge: telecommunications, the banking sector, the insurance sector,electricity, railways, etc.
2. The government can be the contractor of services to private entities, especially for certain commercial goods with a clear public service function under certain conditions.
3. Government organisations can remain directly responsible for the delivery of services. In this case, the government may define an overall framework for the delivery of services
and define what services can be provided at arm’s-length and what general relationships should be built for ensuring the good governance of the overall system. The fewer the categories, and the more uniform the rules applying to them, the more intelligible the public governance system is to politicians, civil servants and citizens alike. Having too many forms of government organisations and too many organisations increases the risk that they will not work together on important common objectives, or that complex problems of public policy “fall between the cracks” of organisations’ responsibilities.
While the relative “autonomy” of some government entities may be desirable, changes in organisational form should aim at preserving good governance and accountability in the
use of resources.
1. The government can be the regulator of service provision and delivery by the private sector. Apart from general market supervision by anti-trust authorities, this particularly
involves sectors where forms of natural monopoly or undesirable forms of market power tend to emerge: telecommunications, the banking sector, the insurance sector,electricity, railways, etc.
2. The government can be the contractor of services to private entities, especially for certain commercial goods with a clear public service function under certain conditions.
3. Government organisations can remain directly responsible for the delivery of services. In this case, the government may define an overall framework for the delivery of services
and define what services can be provided at arm’s-length and what general relationships should be built for ensuring the good governance of the overall system. The fewer the categories, and the more uniform the rules applying to them, the more intelligible the public governance system is to politicians, civil servants and citizens alike. Having too many forms of government organisations and too many organisations increases the risk that they will not work together on important common objectives, or that complex problems of public policy “fall between the cracks” of organisations’ responsibilities.
While the relative “autonomy” of some government entities may be desirable, changes in organisational form should aim at preserving good governance and accountability in the
use of resources.
有三个不同的政府职能: 1. 政府可以提供的服务和监管的私营机构. 除了一般的市场监管反托拉斯当局,尤其 涉及自然垄断行业形式的市场力量或不良倾向出现:电信、银行、保险、电力、铁路等. 2. 政府可以承包给私人机构服务,特别是对某些商品有一个明确的公共服务职能,在某些条件. 3. 对直接负责的政府机构可继续提供服务. 在这种情况下,政府可制定总体框架提供服务 并确定哪些服务可以提供使得长度一般什么关系应该建立良好的管理,确保整个系统. 少的种类和适用规则更加统一,更加清晰的公共管理制度是政治人物、公务员和市民一样. 太多形式的政府机构和团体的增加太多的风险,他们不会一起重大的共同目标,即到复杂的公共政策问题"落在"组织的责任. 而相对的"自治",可一些政府机构、组织形式变化的目的是要维护良好的管理与责任 利用资源.
政府可以有三个功能